Generating Impact: Challenges Faced When Promoting the Adoption of Geographical Tools for Informing Public Policy
Gary Higgs & Mitchel Langford
What the paper says
Drawing on the application of spatial analytical tools (based on floating catchment area (FCA) methods), this commentary highlights some of the challenges faced in promoting the use of geographical techniques to address aspects of government policy/delivery. There is an ever‐expanding academic literature concerned with the application of FCA techniques in a range of thematic areas, the majority of which inevitably conclude with claims for some degree of policy relevance. If geographers are to have a meaningful input, there is a need to demonstrate the impact of applying these types of spatial analytical techniques to address real‐world policy challenges. We draw on our experiences in using these tools in applied studies to firstly highlight an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to advocate for an alternative methodology as part of the construction of a domain of indicators in successive versions of an index of multiple deprivation in Wales. Meanwhile, researchers based within Ofsted, by drawing on the application of multi‐modal FCA approaches to measure localised access to childcare in England, have shown that it is possible to work in collaboration with academics and others to address important government policy initiatives using such techniques. We conclude by briefly summarising the lessons learnt from our experiences of applying these tools in policy contexts with varying degrees of impact.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.