Communicatively constructing resilience in public education organizations: Invoking a bigger purpose and growth mindset messaging

Jessica K. Kamrath et al.

Management Learning2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076261428934article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study explores how organizational members draw on discursive resources to enact resilience when navigating challenges in a public education institution. Drawing on qualitative interview data from educators, findings reveal that resilience is a dynamic, socially constructed, collective process that emerges through (1) invoking a bigger purpose, where challenges are discursively framed as inherent in meaningful work, and (2) growth mindset messaging, where learning is foregrounded through storytelling. Taken together, these communicative practices make up a recursive process—with drawing on past experiences of successfully overcoming adversity and discursive framing—to co-construct individual and collective resilience in the organizational context of public education. Our findings extend the literature on meaningful work, growth mindsets, and the Communication Theory of Resilience. We offer practical implications for (1) cultivating growth mindset messaging and (2) building narratives anchored in a bigger purpose to foster a collective identity.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076261428934

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jessica2026,
  title        = {{Communicatively constructing resilience in public education organizations: Invoking a bigger purpose and growth mindset messaging}},
  author       = {Jessica K. Kamrath et al.},
  journal      = {Management Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076261428934},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Communicatively constructing resilience in public education organizations: Invoking a bigger purpose and growth mindset messaging

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.