arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Respecting autonomy in the guardianship appointment process for individuals with dementia in Finland: Legal and medical perspectives

Kaisa Näkki et al.

Medical Law International2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332261424926article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study explores how legal experts and physicians ensure the autonomy of individuals with dementia when assessing the need for legal guardianship and appointing guardians. Through interviews with 20 legal experts and 30 physicians, and thematic analysis, the research identified key analytical groups. Legal experts focus on (1) Ascertaining the individual’s views and (2) Minimising interference with autonomy. Physicians emphasise (1) ascertaining the individual’s views, (2) Supporting the realisation of autonomy and (3) Providing accurate information on the legal process. The study found that legal experts strongly respect autonomy, sometimes even deviating from strict legal requirements to ensure that individuals with dementia are heard and their opinions considered during court proceedings. Although physicians generally stress the patient’s autonomy, they prioritise protecting the individual more than legal experts.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332261424926

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kaisa2026,
  title        = {{Respecting autonomy in the guardianship appointment process for individuals with dementia in Finland: Legal and medical perspectives}},
  author       = {Kaisa Näkki et al.},
  journal      = {Medical Law International},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332261424926},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Respecting autonomy in the guardianship appointment process for individuals with dementia in Finland: Legal and medical perspectives

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.