arbiter
JournalsAccount

Antidote for the personalization-privacy paradox: Does algorithm transparency trigger higher ad click-through intention than algorithm literacy?

Minjeong Ham & Sang Woo Lee

Internet Research2026https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2023-0672article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates whether the personalization–privacy paradox can be resolved under conditions not previously explored: algorithm transparency (AGT) and algorithm literacy (AGL). Design/methodology/approach An online experiment was conducted, and a moderated-moderated mediation model was assessed. Findings AGL reduced privacy concerns for highly personalized advertising, with literate consumers perceiving lower risks and showing higher click intention when algorithms were transparent. AGT proved more effective than literacy in resolving the personalization-privacy paradox. Research limitations/implications This study extends privacy paradox research by identifying how algorithm-related variables (transparency and literacy) moderate the relationship between personalization level and privacy concerns through risk perception. The findings suggest new research directions examining how varying personalization levels interact with algorithmic factors influencing consumer behavior. Practical implications Online platforms need to effectively communicate their algorithmic processes by explaining both technical operations and potential consequences of data usage. Rather than imposing penalties to reduce personalization levels, policymakers should promote AGT and enhance consumer education to help users make informed decisions about personalized advertising. Originality/value This study highlights the importance of exploring the black box of algorithms. For academia, this study expands previous findings by presenting algorithm-related conditions that serve as potential boundary conditions to resolve the personalization-privacy paradox. For the advertising industry, this study offers practitioners and policymakers insights into algorithm operation strategies rather than regulations.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2023-0672

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{minjeong2026,
  title        = {{Antidote for the personalization-privacy paradox: Does algorithm transparency trigger higher ad click-through intention than algorithm literacy?}},
  author       = {Minjeong Ham & Sang Woo Lee},
  journal      = {Internet Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2023-0672},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Antidote for the personalization-privacy paradox: Does algorithm transparency trigger higher ad click-through intention than algorithm literacy?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.