Abandonment of cross-border acquisitions: The role of target country context

Martina Musteen et al.

Journal of World Business2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101638article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Drawing primarily upon institutional theory, we examine the impact of the target country context on the abandonment of cross-border acquisitions (CBAs). We focus on four inter-related but distinct dimensions of target country context – the quality of formal institutions reflected in the regulatory ease of doing business, the quality of informal institutions assessed as the level of corruption, the city location of the acquisition target (i.e. whether the acquisition target is located in a global city vs. elsewhere), and the overall level of country economic development (i.e., advanced vs. emerging). Based on this framework, we argue that while business-friendly formal institutions in the target country generally reduce the likelihood of CBA abandonment, the quality of informal institutions has a non-linear effect on CBA abandonment, and the location of the acquisition target in a global city reduces the likelihood of CBA abandonment. We also posit that these relationships are moderated by the target country's level of economic development. We test these predictions using a large sample of 1,459 CBAs in 70 target countries and find empirical support for most of our hypotheses.

6 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101638

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{martina2025,
  title        = {{Abandonment of cross-border acquisitions: The role of target country context}},
  author       = {Martina Musteen et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of World Business},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101638},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Abandonment of cross-border acquisitions: The role of target country context

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.44 × 0.4 = 0.18
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.