Incentive Mechanism in Port Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on Blockchain and Contract Optimization

Jing Hu & Yonggang Zuo

International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management2025https://doi.org/10.4018/ijisscm.376483article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The research findings indicate that the blockchain-induced optimization coefficient of logistics costs is positively associated with the wholesale prices of logistics capabilities. Conversely, it is negatively correlated with the unit service cost of carrier enterprises, as well as the profit of the port logistics service supply chain (LSSC). Both revenue-sharing contracts and quantity-flexibility contracts are capable of achieving the coordination of the port LSSC. The coordination condition is that the wholesale price of logistics capacity equals the unit service cost of carrier enterprises after blockchain-based optimization. These contracts enable flexible profit distribution within the port LSSC, thereby enhancing its overall coordination.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijisscm.376483

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jing2025,
  title        = {{Incentive Mechanism in Port Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on Blockchain and Contract Optimization}},
  author       = {Jing Hu & Yonggang Zuo},
  journal      = {International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/ijisscm.376483},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Incentive Mechanism in Port Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on Blockchain and Contract Optimization

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.