← Back to results Population Games with Sub-Strategies and Evolutionary Nash Equilibrium Learning Matthew S. Hankins et al.
Abstract We establish a modified notion of Nash equilibrium learning—convergence of the population state to the Nash equilibria set—in a generalization of the standard population games and evolutionary dynamics framework using system-theoretic passivity methods. In this setting, we allow each strategy to involve a sequence of sub-tasks that must be completed before strategy revision so long as the durations of the sub-tasks can be modeled with Erlang or exponential distributions. Furthermore, several canonical classes of natural learning rules are established and useful properties are derived.
1 citation
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-025-00689-5 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{matthew2026,
title = {{Population Games with Sub-Strategies and Evolutionary Nash Equilibrium Learning}},
author = {Matthew S. Hankins et al.},
journal = {Dynamic Games and Applications},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-025-00689-5},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Population Games with Sub-Strategies and Evolutionary Nash Equilibrium Learning
AU - al., Matthew S. Hankins et
JO - Dynamic Games and Applications
PY - 2026
ER - Matthew S. Hankins et al. (2026). Population Games with Sub-Strategies and Evolutionary Nash Equilibrium Learning. *Dynamic Games and Applications*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-025-00689-5 Matthew S. Hankins et al.. "Population Games with Sub-Strategies and Evolutionary Nash Equilibrium Learning." *Dynamic Games and Applications* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-025-00689-5. Population Games with Sub-Strategies and Evolutionary Nash Equilibrium Learning
Matthew S. Hankins et al. · Dynamic Games and Applications · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-025-00689-5 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 M · momentum 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.