The role of culture in mitigating information asymmetries in portfolio choice decisions

Stefanos Ioannou et al.

International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbaaf.2025.151908article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We expand the literature on investment home bias by considering the impact of novel indicators associated with information asymmetries and cultural proximity. Our sample covers the period 2014-2019 and includes 10,205 country pairs. For measuring information asymmetries, we construct a novel indicator based on financial secrecy data. For cultural proximity we consider, separately, the impact of religious proximity and the role of countries as hosts to global financial centres. We expect the presence of global financial centres to feed positively into investors' sense of familiarity and trust. Our findings show that foreign portfolio investors' decisions are negatively affected by the presence of between-country informational asymmetries. In contrast, religious proximity fosters trust and increases the willingness of investors to invest in foreign financial assets. Finally, we detect a financial centre bias, conceptually related to home bias. All else the same, countries hosting global financial centres are more likely to invest reciprocally.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbaaf.2025.151908

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stefanos2025,
  title        = {{The role of culture in mitigating information asymmetries in portfolio choice decisions}},
  author       = {Stefanos Ioannou et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbaaf.2025.151908},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The role of culture in mitigating information asymmetries in portfolio choice decisions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.