Gender and Agricultural Productivity

Cheryl R. Doss

Annual Review of Resource Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-112923-094322article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.48

Abstract

A growing literature on agricultural productivity in low- and middle-income countries has asked whether the gender of farmers may influence the level or growth rate of productivity. Using new data at the plot level, researchers have compared the productivity of plots managed by men and women. Expanding these analyses to include jointly managed and collectively managed plots has provided new insights. A promising trend, especially for contexts where family farms are managed as a unit, is to consider the productivity implications of specific characteristics of household members and their roles in farming. Women's empowerment and expanded roles in decision-making have been shown to improve household-level agricultural productivity. But as rural landscapes are transforming, it is also important to consider the gender and productivity issues arising in commercial and medium-scale farms, in contract farming and outgrower schemes, and in wage labor in agriculture. This article identifies both the potentials and limitations of different research methods and approaches.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-112923-094322

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cheryl2025,
  title        = {{Gender and Agricultural Productivity}},
  author       = {Cheryl R. Doss},
  journal      = {Annual Review of Resource Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-112923-094322},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Gender and Agricultural Productivity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.