arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Arms Industry and International Criminal Liability: Challenging the Status Quo?

Marina Aksenova

Business and Human Rights Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2025.3article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

There is increased public attention directed to the topic of weapons trade and this is a positive development because enhanced scrutiny holds a promise of bringing more accountability to the field that has long been obscure. This article reviews the possibility of criminal prosecutions of corporate officials for supplying weapons to Gaza, Yemen and Ukraine at the International Criminal Court (ICC) or a similar forum. The Nuremberg Trials planted seeds for such an endeavour by holding several industrialists criminally liable. Yet, modern international criminal law has so far largely stayed away from defining the scope of individual criminal responsibility for corporate officials. The case studies in this paper reveal that the moment is not ripe for commencing actual investigations at the ICC. Nonetheless, a future consensus is slowly building through (often failed) attempts to use legal or policy avenues to define the standards of conduct in the weapons trade.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2025.3

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{marina2026,
  title        = {{The Arms Industry and International Criminal Liability: Challenging the Status Quo?}},
  author       = {Marina Aksenova},
  journal      = {Business and Human Rights Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2025.3},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Arms Industry and International Criminal Liability: Challenging the Status Quo?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.