Ingredients for Success: The Implementation of the Community Advisory Council System in the City of Detroit

Kyu-Nahm Jun & Juliet Musso

Urban Affairs Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251412363article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Recently, there has been renewed interest in engaging citizens locally. While political motivations vary, a common goal is to enhance participation and representation by creating formal bodies of community representatives to play an advisory role in policy processes. This paper integrates implementation feasibility and participatory theories to develop a theoretical framework for assessing the implementation of public participation mechanisms. It applies this framework in an analysis of Detroit, which adopted a charter-mandated Community Advisory Council system within the new city council districts in 2012. The research illuminates the limitations of Detroit's system, explaining why citywide implementation continues to lag. The findings underscore the importance of cohesive statutory objectives, institutional reform that supports the coordinated efforts of city agents, clarity of decision rules, dedicated city resources, and commitment on the part of community, political, and administrative leaders in such reforms.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251412363

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kyu-nahm2026,
  title        = {{Ingredients for Success: The Implementation of the Community Advisory Council System in the City of Detroit}},
  author       = {Kyu-Nahm Jun & Juliet Musso},
  journal      = {Urban Affairs Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874251412363},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ingredients for Success: The Implementation of the Community Advisory Council System in the City of Detroit

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.