← Back to results LGBTIQA + Inclusion in Aged Care: Perspectives From Providers and Community Stakeholders Daniel Tissot et al.
Abstract While policy frameworks and 'special needs' recognition exist, genuine inclusion for older LGBTIQA+ Australians hinges on operationalising cultural safety through consistent governance, stronger compliance mechanisms and a mandatory, well-resourced training regimen for the aged care workforce. These findings provide critical implications for policy reform and practice improvement under Australia's evolving aged care standards.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70129 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{daniel2026,
title = {{LGBTIQA + Inclusion in Aged Care: Perspectives From Providers and Community Stakeholders}},
author = {Daniel Tissot et al.},
journal = {Australasian Journal on Ageing},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70129},
} TY - JOUR
TI - LGBTIQA + Inclusion in Aged Care: Perspectives From Providers and Community Stakeholders
AU - al., Daniel Tissot et
JO - Australasian Journal on Ageing
PY - 2026
ER - Daniel Tissot et al. (2026). LGBTIQA + Inclusion in Aged Care: Perspectives From Providers and Community Stakeholders. *Australasian Journal on Ageing*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70129 Daniel Tissot et al.. "LGBTIQA + Inclusion in Aged Care: Perspectives From Providers and Community Stakeholders." *Australasian Journal on Ageing* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70129. LGBTIQA + Inclusion in Aged Care: Perspectives From Providers and Community Stakeholders
Daniel Tissot et al. · Australasian Journal on Ageing · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70129 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.