arbiter
JournalsAccount

Bank Resolution and Judicial Review: Lessons of the Banco Popular Litigation

Marco Lamandini & David Ramos Muñoz

European Business Organization Law Review2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-024-00337-2article
ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Resolution of a troubled institution and the allocation of losses among creditors can be an efficient way to avoid contagion and minimize taxpayer support, but raises major issues of fairness and equity towards shareholders and creditors, which are a source of tensions. The Banco Popular litigation saga offers clear empirical evidence of these tensions. This essay discusses the main lessons that can be drawn from that litigation.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-024-00337-2

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{marco2025,
  title        = {{Bank Resolution and Judicial Review: Lessons of the Banco Popular Litigation}},
  author       = {Marco Lamandini & David Ramos Muñoz},
  journal      = {European Business Organization Law Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-024-00337-2},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bank Resolution and Judicial Review: Lessons of the Banco Popular Litigation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.