arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Dialectical-Relational Linguistics: Toward a Unified Theory of Language as Social Process

Cal Edwards

Science & Society2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251409084article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Dialectical-Relational Linguistics (DRL) is presented as a scientific framework grounded in dialectical materialism. Language is treated as a historically developing, socially stratified, and ideologically saturated form of human activity. DRL synthesizes insights from Marxist philosophy, Soviet cultural-historical psychology, variationist sociolinguistics, systemic-functional grammar, and materialist discourse theory. Five principles—contradiction, mediation, totality, motion, and praxis—structure the paradigm. This approach is applied across phonology, morphosyntax, semantics, pragmatics, discourse, acquisition, and language change, treating each domain as a moment within a structured totality shaped by class struggle and ideological reproduction. DRL also develops a methodology emphasizing historical causality, relational depth, and scientific reflexivity. It aims to unify fragmented linguistic research traditions and reconstruct a materialist science of language, without reducing language to isolated structures or dissolving it into discourse analysis. DRL is proposed as a foundation for future empirical and theoretical inquiry within a historical-materialist framework.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251409084

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cal2026,
  title        = {{Dialectical-Relational Linguistics: Toward a Unified Theory of Language as Social Process}},
  author       = {Cal Edwards},
  journal      = {Science & Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00368237251409084},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dialectical-Relational Linguistics: Toward a Unified Theory of Language as Social Process

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.