Net Worth Optimization

Thomas M. Idzorek & Paul D. Kaplan

Financial Planning Review2025https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1200article
ABDC B
Weight
0.44

Abstract

Recent work puts forth “net worth optimization” as an extension of asset‐only mean–variance optimization and liability‐relative optimization in which all of the components of an individual's holistic economic balance sheet are included in the optimization. This type of holistic, total portfolio optimization is constrained to include an untradable allocation to two entries in an individual economic balance sheet: the person's human capital and the person's nondiscretionary consumption liability, in which both are modeled as separate personalized combinations of asset classes (and perhaps individual stocks or bonds) based on the expected nature of their cash flow characteristics. In a series of controlled optimizations in which various parameters are varied, we study how changes in human capital modeling (riskiness) and balance sheet strength (funding status) influence the recommended asset allocation for an investor's financial capital asset allocation. Net worth optimization separates an investor's risk tolerance (attitude toward risk) from the investor's ability to take on risk (risk capacity), allowing risk tolerance to serve its original purpose.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1200

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thomas2025,
  title        = {{Net Worth Optimization}},
  author       = {Thomas M. Idzorek & Paul D. Kaplan},
  journal      = {Financial Planning Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cfp2.1200},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Net Worth Optimization

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.