Employee well-being: human resource practices and perceived ethical leadership climate

Esther Villajos et al.

Management Decision2026https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2025-0839article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This study aims to analyze the mediating role of ethical leadership climate in the relationship between sustainable HR practices (PEP - performance-enhancement practices, and ESP - employee-support practices) and employee hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Design/methodology/approach 741 employees from different Spanish organizations participated in the study. We conducted a SEM with MPlus to test the hypotheses and used the Monte Carlo method to assess mediation. Findings We identified distinct pathways in the relationship between HR practices and well-being, mediated by the ethical leadership climate. In particular, a total mediation was found for the relationship between PEP and eudaimonic well-being, while a partial mediation was identified in the relationship between PEP and hedonic well-being, as well as between ESP and both dimensions of well-being. Originality/value We adopted a sustainable approach to HR practices by simultaneously considering two bundles of practices (PEP and ESP) and their relationship with four different well-being indicators (intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction for hedonic well-being and purpose in life and personal growth for eudaimonic well-being). Moreover, ethical leadership climate helps us establish different paths for how HR practices can be related to employee well-being.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2025-0839

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{esther2026,
  title        = {{Employee well-being: human resource practices and perceived ethical leadership climate}},
  author       = {Esther Villajos et al.},
  journal      = {Management Decision},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2025-0839},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Employee well-being: human resource practices and perceived ethical leadership climate

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.