arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Exploiting Empathetic Women Leaders and the Shadow Side of Servant-Leadership

Lynn M. Horan

Journal of Management Spirituality and Religion2026https://doi.org/10.51327/lrla1613article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Through a feminist constructivist grounded theory study of mid-career Protestant clergy women who have left active ministry due to violations of their interpersonal boundaries and psychological safety (Horan, 2024, 2025), this discussion presents the central theoretical proposition of the shadow side of servant-leadership in the context of feminized servanthood. Dimensional analysis of participant interviews revealed core dimensions of 1) experiencing feminized servanthood as dehumanizing and 2) experiencing feminized servanthood as abusive, revealing concrete ways in which self-sacrificial love and empathy in women’s leadership is systematically exploited through oppressive gendered narratives of self-emptying (Davis, 1993), altruism and selflessness (Reynolds, 2014), and sacrificial demand (Wray-Bliss & de Pater, 2025). The study findings expand the scope of previous servant-leadership theory and practice (Greenleaf, 2002) in both religious and non-religious leadership contexts, by calling for more liberative and decolonizing ways of conceptualizing compassionate love and empathy beyond harmful expectations of the self-sacrificial woman leader.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51327/lrla1613

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lynn2026,
  title        = {{Exploiting Empathetic Women Leaders and the Shadow Side of Servant-Leadership}},
  author       = {Lynn M. Horan},
  journal      = {Journal of Management Spirituality and Religion},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51327/lrla1613},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploiting Empathetic Women Leaders and the Shadow Side of Servant-Leadership

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.