The security impact of the Rohingya refugee crisis on Bangladesh and regional states: a securitization theoretical perspective

Mohammed Nuruzzaman & Abdul Wohab

International Journal of Asian Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591426100709article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The Rohingya refugee crisis, a major humanitarian tragedy in contemporary global politics, has gradually precipitated major security challenges to Bangladesh and other states. This paper employs the Copenhagen School’s securitization theory to examine how securitization, especially by the Bangladeshi government and media, has framed these challenges as existential threats. It makes two basic contributions to existing literature on the Rohingya crisis. Firstly, it provides a theory-informed analysis of the security dimensions of the crisis, considering the interplay between the refugee crisis and national and regional security dynamics. Secondly, the paper explores how the refugees securitize their current plight. Empirically, the study utilizes interview data from 60 local residents, law enforcement agencies, and employees of local and international NGOs. The discussion suggests the possibilities and limitations of the securitization theory in the field of refugee or forced migration studies in the Global South.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591426100709

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mohammed2026,
  title        = {{The security impact of the Rohingya refugee crisis on Bangladesh and regional states: a securitization theoretical perspective}},
  author       = {Mohammed Nuruzzaman & Abdul Wohab},
  journal      = {International Journal of Asian Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479591426100709},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The security impact of the Rohingya refugee crisis on Bangladesh and regional states: a securitization theoretical perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.