← Back to results Explaining team effectiveness and creativity in MBA team consulting projects Yang Zhang et al.
What the paper says Inderscience is a global company, a dynamic leading independent journal publisher disseminates the latest research across the broad fields of science, engineering and technology; management, public and business administration; environment, ecological economics and sustainable development; computing, ICT and internet/web services, and related areas.
Open paper page → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2026.10077532 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{yang2026,
title = {{Explaining team effectiveness and creativity in MBA team consulting projects}},
author = {Yang Zhang et al.},
journal = {International Journal of Knowledge and Learning},
year = {2026},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2026.10077532},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Explaining team effectiveness and creativity in MBA team consulting projects
AU - al., Yang Zhang et
JO - International Journal of Knowledge and Learning
PY - 2026
ER - Yang Zhang et al. (2026). Explaining team effectiveness and creativity in MBA team consulting projects. *International Journal of Knowledge and Learning*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2026.10077532 Yang Zhang et al.. "Explaining team effectiveness and creativity in MBA team consulting projects." *International Journal of Knowledge and Learning* (2026). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2026.10077532. Explaining team effectiveness and creativity in MBA team consulting projects
Yang Zhang et al. · International Journal of Knowledge and Learning · 2026
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2026.10077532 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.