Collegiality Washing? New Translations of Collegial Practices

Kerstin Sahlin & Ulla Eriksson‐Zetterquist

Research in the Sociology of Organizations2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20230000087007book-chapter
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.75

What the paper says

Over the past few decades, university reforms in line with management and enterprise ideals have been well documented. Changes in the ideals underlying the missions of universities have led to changes in their modes of governing and organizing, which in turn drive further transformation of their missions. One set of reforms in Swedish higher education has been the dissolution of collegial bodies and procedures. At the same time, in recent years, we have witnessed an increased interest in collegiality and a reintroduction of collegial bodies and procedures. New translations of collegiality appear not only in how universities are organized, but also in other core aspects of research and higher education. We review examples of peer reviewing, research assessment, and direct recruitment of professors and ask: Can these new translations of collegiality be understood as a revitalization of collegiality, or is it – to draw a parallel with greenwashing – rather a matter of collegiality-washing?

4 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20230000087007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kerstin2023,
  title        = {{Collegiality Washing? New Translations of Collegial Practices}},
  author       = {Kerstin Sahlin & Ulla Eriksson‐Zetterquist},
  journal      = {Research in the Sociology of Organizations},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x20230000087007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Collegiality Washing? New Translations of Collegial Practices

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.75

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.