arbiter
JournalsAccount

Choosing not to borrow: Imprinting effects of informality on firms’ credit self-rationing

Jin WenWen

Borsa Istanbul Review2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2026.100785article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

While firm financing constraints have been widely studied, limited attention has been paid to credit self-rationing. Based on the imprinting hypothesis and firm-level data from 30 countries, this study finds that informal experience significantly increases the likelihood of avoiding formal credit. This effect operates via structural and behavioral imprints shaped by early institutional exposure. Specifically, the formality of institutional structure and compliance behaviors both reinforce firms’ self-rationing tendencies, whereas no evidence exists that cognitive imprints operate as an effective mediating channel. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that the effects are stronger for non-female-led firms, particularly in countries characterized by weaker business environments. Moreover, the effect is most pronounced among firms facing severe financing obstacles, suggesting that avoidance motives outweigh optimization motives. The study provides demand-side evidence on the developmental origins of financing behavior in emerging and developing economies and offers implications for improving financial inclusion.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2026.100785

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jin2026,
  title        = {{Choosing not to borrow: Imprinting effects of informality on firms’ credit self-rationing}},
  author       = {Jin WenWen},
  journal      = {Borsa Istanbul Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2026.100785},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Choosing not to borrow: Imprinting effects of informality on firms’ credit self-rationing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.