An Extended Merton Problem With Relaxed Benchmark Tracking

Lijun Bo et al.

Mathematical Finance2025https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.70015article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This paper studies Merton's problem in an extended formulation by incorporating a benchmark tracking on the wealth process. We consider a tracking formulation where the fund manager aims to maximize the trade‐off between the expected utility of consumption and the expected largest shortfall in wealth relative to the benchmark level. Equivalently, the problem can be interpreted as a mixed stochastic control problem if a fictitious capital injection singular control is allowed, subject to the dynamic constraint that the wealth process compensated by the costly capital injection outperforms the benchmark at all times. By considering an auxiliary state process, we formulate an equivalent stochastic control problem with state reflections at zero. For general utility functions and Itô's diffusion benchmark process, we develop a convex duality theorem, new to the literature, for the auxiliary stochastic control problem with state reflections in which the dual process also exhibits reflections from above. For CRRA utility and geometric Brownian motion benchmark process, we further derive the optimal portfolio and consumption in feedback form using the new duality theorem, allowing us to discuss some interesting financial implications induced by the additional risk‐taking from the capital injection and the goal of tracking.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.70015

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lijun2025,
  title        = {{An Extended Merton Problem With Relaxed Benchmark Tracking}},
  author       = {Lijun Bo et al.},
  journal      = {Mathematical Finance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.70015},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

An Extended Merton Problem With Relaxed Benchmark Tracking

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.