arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Educational Spending Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Index

Chaimae Ghernouk & Mariem Liouaeddine

Economies2026https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040110article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This study examines the efficiency and productivity of public education expenditure in 20 countries using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist Productivity Index over the period 2011–2023. Focusing on science and mathematics performance at the primary and lower-secondary levels, the results show that higher public spending does not necessarily lead to better educational outcomes, highlighting the importance of efficient resource allocation. The DEA estimates reveal substantial cross-country heterogeneity in efficiency, while the Malmquist results indicate positive total factor productivity growth across all countries, driven mainly by technical progress rather than efficiency catch-up. Countries such as Morocco, Japan, Turkey, and Iran exhibit sustained productivity improvements, particularly in 2019–2023. Persistent disparities in efficiency and productivity are closely associated with differences in education policies, governance, and socio-economic contexts. Overall, the findings stress the need for efficiency-oriented education reforms to enhance performance and promote sustainable growth.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040110

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{chaimae2026,
  title        = {{Educational Spending Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Index}},
  author       = {Chaimae Ghernouk & Mariem Liouaeddine},
  journal      = {Economies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14040110},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Educational Spending Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Index

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.