arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Dual routes of persuasion in tourism: building marine destination image through the elaboration likelihood model

Yuliana Riana Prasetyawati et al.

International Journal of Business Innovation and Research2026https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2026.151496article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study investigates the dual routes of persuasion in shaping destination image and visit intention within the context of Indonesia's marine tourism digital marketing.The research employed a quantitative approach, collecting data from 300 participants aged 21 to 40, most of whom reported daily internet use.The research model explores the influence of central and peripheral route cues on the cognitive and affective dimensions of destination image and visit intention.The findings demonstrate that both argument quality and review quality significantly enhance cognitive destination image, with review quality having a greater impact.Source credibility and visual appeal significantly influenced affective destination image, whereas review quantity did not.Both cognitive and affective destination images positively affect visit intention, with affective image exerting a stronger effect.The results underscore the importance of high-quality content and credible sources in online tourism marketing.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2026.151496

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yuliana2026,
  title        = {{Dual routes of persuasion in tourism: building marine destination image through the elaboration likelihood model}},
  author       = {Yuliana Riana Prasetyawati et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Business Innovation and Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbir.2026.151496},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dual routes of persuasion in tourism: building marine destination image through the elaboration likelihood model

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.