arbiter
JournalsAccount

Bridging the Gap to Access? Impact of Pre-Collegiate Summer Program on College Outcomes

Puja Shakya

Education Finance and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.a.440article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

U.S. colleges face persistent inequities—not only in who enrolls, but in who ultimately graduates. While institutions have expanded efforts to diversify incoming classes, students from historically underserved backgrounds, including those who are first-generation and economically disadvantaged, continue to face several barriers that affect their rate of degree completion. This paper evaluates the causal impact of the a bridge program called BSP, an eight-week pre-collegiate summer initiative at a large public land grant university designed to support such students in their transition to college. Leveraging a fuzzy regression discontinuity design within a local randomization inference framework, I find that BSP substantially improves first-year completion and second-year persistence. While participants receive a $2,500 annual scholarship, comparative analyses of similar financial aid programs suggest that the bundled nature of BSP—including structured summer programming, academic mentoring, and peer support—is central to its effectiveness. These findings underscore the importance of holistic interventions that address both financial and non-financial barriers to student success.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.a.440

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{puja2026,
  title        = {{Bridging the Gap to Access? Impact of Pre-Collegiate Summer Program on College Outcomes}},
  author       = {Puja Shakya},
  journal      = {Education Finance and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.a.440},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bridging the Gap to Access? Impact of Pre-Collegiate Summer Program on College Outcomes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.