Cheating at Ethics:

Devon Baranek & Kathleen Dunne

Journal of Accounting, Business and Management2025https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v32i1.1193article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This teaching case utilizes a real-world example of ethics violations occurring at Ernst and Young, one of the Big Four accounting firms. An SEC investigation revealed widespread cheating by its employees on professional education exams required for CPA licensing. The misconduct violated federal securities laws and the codes of conduct of several professional organizations. It was also not the first time EY had addressed ethical misconduct amongst its employees, but it failed to prevent or stop the practice from continuing. EY was fined $100 million and required to hire independent consultants to review its policies, ethics and disclosure procedures. Students are required to read through the case and work in groups to answer questions ranging in difficulty based on course level. The EY case is simple enough to be understood by all students, but may be used as a starting point for more advanced discussions on the ethical obligations and responsibilities of accountants and the accounting profession.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v32i1.1193

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{devon2025,
  title        = {{Cheating at Ethics:}},
  author       = {Devon Baranek & Kathleen Dunne},
  journal      = {Journal of Accounting, Business and Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31966/jabminternational.v32i1.1193},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cheating at Ethics:

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.