‘Escaping Isn't for Everyone’: Kurdish Smugglers’ Navigational Tactics at Checkpoints in Iran

Peyman Zinati

Development and Change2026https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70060article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines how Kurdish smugglers navigate state and insurgent checkpoints in the borderlands of western Iran. Drawing on ethnographic research, it analyses two key navigational tactics: persin , a form of negotiated passage involving transaction, recognition and the contingent toleration of authority; and jimi , rendered here as fugitive passage, comprising situated manoeuvres to evade, avoid or escape checkpoint control. These tactics operate as constitutive practices that forge the informal and contingent orders emerging at checkpoints. Smugglers co‐produce these checkpoint orders by physically and relationally navigating the infrastructures that govern mobility. Grounded in the ‘politics of passage’, the analysis positions checkpoints as active arenas of claim making where authority is enacted, transacted and reconfigured in practice. Attending to divergent checkpoint regimes, the article demonstrates that state checkpoints rely on personalized and unpredictable extraction, whereas insurgent checkpoints impose routinized, moralized systems of taxation. Smugglers adjust their tactics accordingly, revealing how infrastructures of mobility are shaped by both sovereign enforcement and those who navigate, subvert and rework their constraints.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70060

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{peyman2026,
  title        = {{‘Escaping Isn't for Everyone’: Kurdish Smugglers’ Navigational Tactics at Checkpoints in Iran}},
  author       = {Peyman Zinati},
  journal      = {Development and Change},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70060},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

‘Escaping Isn't for Everyone’: Kurdish Smugglers’ Navigational Tactics at Checkpoints in Iran

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.