Deepfakes in Domestic and International Perspective

Jane C. Ginsburg & Graeme W. Austin

Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts2025https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v48i3.13868article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Have you always (or ever) yearned to produce your own recording of Elvis Presley singing great baritone arias from Italian opera? Or to make a movie starring Nicole Kidman as Lady Macbeth? Or a videogame featuring the bully who tormented you in high school suffering repeated tortures worthy of the Christian martyrdoms recounted with gusto in The Golden Legend? You can fulfill all these wishes, and more, thanks to the AI technology enabling the creation of “deepfakes”—known in legal documents as “digital replicas”—capable of simulating the visual and vocal appearance of real people, living or dead. AI programs can also generate musical compositions in the style of well- known composers or performers, as well as video sequences. What may be good fun in private may become pernicious, offensive, and even dangerous, if widely disseminated over social media or through commercial channels. But, at least in the U.S., legal protections for performers and ordinary individuals against digital replicas, are at best, scanty.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v48i3.13868

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jane2025,
  title        = {{Deepfakes in Domestic and International Perspective}},
  author       = {Jane C. Ginsburg & Graeme W. Austin},
  journal      = {Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52214/jla.v48i3.13868},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Deepfakes in Domestic and International Perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.