When and why does observability increase honesty? The role of gossip and reputational concern

Annika S. Nieper et al.

Judgment and Decision Making2025https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.10article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

People frequently engage in dishonest behavior, which entails costs to society. A common advice to increase honesty is to enhance observability. However, previous research produced conflicting findings, making it unclear when and why observability increases honesty. Here we show that observability enhances honesty when observers can gossip to relevant others (i.e., to future interaction partners who can influence the gossip target’s outcome), because it increases reputational concern. In 2 incentivized and pre-registered studies, participants privately rolled a die 30 times and were informed that reporting higher numbers would lead to higher outcomes (total N = 1608; 28650 observations). We manipulated observability and gossip. Both studies revealed that gossip to relevant others decreased dishonest reporting, whereas mere observation did not. Importantly, reputational concern partly mediated the impact of gossip on dishonesty. Moreover, gossip influenced recipients’ trust in gossip targets, with messages denoting dishonesty swaying trust more than messages denoting honesty. Our findings demonstrate when and why observability promotes honesty.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.10

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{annika2025,
  title        = {{When and why does observability increase honesty? The role of gossip and reputational concern}},
  author       = {Annika S. Nieper et al.},
  journal      = {Judgment and Decision Making},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.10},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When and why does observability increase honesty? The role of gossip and reputational concern

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.