arbiter
JournalsAccount

Retraction notice: Innovation adoption across self-service banking technologies in India

Unknown author

International Journal of Bank Marketing2026https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-02-2026-0163article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The International Journal of Bank Marketing wishes to retract the article Kaushik, A.K. and Rahman, Z. (2015), “Innovation adoption across self-service banking technologies in India”, published in International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 96-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-01-2014-0006.It has come to our attention that the article contains substantial similarities to the following article: Curran, J.M. and Meuter, M.L. (2005), “Self-service technology adoption: comparing three technologies”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 103-113, https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040510591411.The authors have fully cooperated with this investigation and supplied the original dataset for review. Using this dataset, the editorial team were unable to replicate the results included in the article, and as a result, the decision has been made to retract the article.The International Journal of Bank Marketing author guidelines make it clear that articles must be original and must not infringe any existing copyright.The journal apologises to both Professor Curran and Professor Meuter, and its readers.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-02-2026-0163

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Retraction notice: Innovation adoption across self-service banking technologies in India}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {International Journal of Bank Marketing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-02-2026-0163},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Retraction notice: Innovation adoption across self-service banking technologies in India

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.