Signpost Testing to Navigate the Parameter Space of the Gaussian Graphical Model With High‐Dimensional Data

Kai Ruan et al.

Biometrical Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.70115article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We evaluate the relevance of external quantitative information on the parameter of a Gaussian graphical model from high-dimensional data. This information comes in the form of a parameter value available from a related knowledge domain or population. We contrast the external information to 'null' information, i.e., an internally accepted parameter value. The direction from a null to this externally provided parameter value is dubbed the signpost. The signpost test evaluates whether to follow the signpost in the search of the true parameter value. We present various test statistics to measure the informativeness of the signpost and ways to obtain their distribution under the null hypothesis of non-informativeness. By simulation, we investigate the power and other properties of the various signpost tests, and compare them to the likelihood ratio test. Finally, we employ the signpost test to illustrate how the learning of the Gaussian graphical model of a low-prevalence breast cancer subtype benefits from external knowledge obtained from data of a more prevalent and related but fundamentally different subtype.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.70115

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kai2026,
  title        = {{Signpost Testing to Navigate the Parameter Space of the Gaussian Graphical Model With High‐Dimensional Data}},
  author       = {Kai Ruan et al.},
  journal      = {Biometrical Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.70115},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Signpost Testing to Navigate the Parameter Space of the Gaussian Graphical Model With High‐Dimensional Data

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.