The Double-Edged Sword of Entrepreneurial Orientation: Product Recalls and the Role of COO Power

Pide Lun et al.

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587261419465article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study examines how entrepreneurial orientation (EO) influences firms’ likelihood of product recalls. Integrating EO and upper echelons theory, we first argue that EO’s bold, variance-enhancing actions increase a firm’s product recall risk by diverting managerial attention away from quality control. Using 23 years of data on U.S. public firms, we find that EO increases recall likelihood. Second, we argue that this relationship is moderated by chief operating officer (COO) power, and the effectiveness of COO power is contingent on the firm’s product life cycle context. Empirical analyses support our theory and offer new insights about EO’s potential downsides.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587261419465

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{pide2026,
  title        = {{The Double-Edged Sword of Entrepreneurial Orientation: Product Recalls and the Role of COO Power}},
  author       = {Pide Lun et al.},
  journal      = {Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587261419465},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Double-Edged Sword of Entrepreneurial Orientation: Product Recalls and the Role of COO Power

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.