Cultural Distance and Tourism Demand: Similarity‐Attraction Theory and Distance Decay Effect

Emmanuel Gamor & Alice H.Y. Hon

Tourism, Culture and Communication2025https://doi.org/10.3727/194341424x17337608246443article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The distance between an origin and a destination plays a crucial role in travel demand. Based on the similarity‐attraction theory and the distance decay effect, this study explores the differences in national culture at different levels and their influence on Hong Kong’s tourism demand. Using the Composite Cultural Distance Index formula, four different cohorts were generated among the key source markets of Hong Kong. Kruskal Walli’s test revealed cultural distance as a significant, influential factor but not the only factor having a fully decaying effect on travel demand, experiences, and satisfaction. Our findings showed that distance affects the demand for tourism and the behavior of tourists. However, the effect decays as the distance upsurges. The Similarity‐Attraction Theory explains the travel activities and characteristics among travelers with similar and dissimilar cultures relative to the destination. Tourism firms and regulatory bodies should segment their markets based on cultural distance and use targeted marketing strategies with significant cultural integration.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3727/194341424x17337608246443

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emmanuel2025,
  title        = {{Cultural Distance and Tourism Demand: Similarity‐Attraction Theory and Distance Decay Effect}},
  author       = {Emmanuel Gamor & Alice H.Y. Hon},
  journal      = {Tourism, Culture and Communication},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3727/194341424x17337608246443},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cultural Distance and Tourism Demand: Similarity‐Attraction Theory and Distance Decay Effect

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.