The Causal Relationship Between Jurisdiction Size and Institutional Quality

Augusto Cerqua et al.

Journal of Regional Science2026https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70057article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

While the relationship between jurisdiction size and economic and electoral outcomes has been extensively studied, its causal impact on institutional capacity and quality remains unexplored. Leveraging the mergers of 197 Italian municipalities, we investigate changes in administrative quality using the Municipal Administration Quality Index (MAQI), a novel composite measure of local administrative capacity and quality based on three pillars: bureaucratic, political, and economic. Using a non‐parametric difference‐in‐differences approach, we find that mergers substantially improve administrative performance. This improvement is driven primarily by the enhanced quality of local politicians and strengthened economic‐fiscal performance, whereas bureaucratic efficiency improves only marginally. We demonstrate that these positive outcomes are attributable to economies of scale and the self‐selection of higher‐quality local politicians, who are drawn by the opportunity to earn higher wages. Our findings contribute to the broader debate on the optimal municipal size and demonstrate that municipal mergers among small municipalities can enhance the quality of local government.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70057

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{augusto2026,
  title        = {{The Causal Relationship Between Jurisdiction Size and Institutional Quality}},
  author       = {Augusto Cerqua et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Regional Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70057},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Causal Relationship Between Jurisdiction Size and Institutional Quality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.