Food‐web structures link multi‐scale processes in complex landscapes

Holly A. L. Harris et al.

Ecology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70306article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Complex landscapes are challenging to study because both the higher level contextual and interacting lower level mechanistic processes underpinning their ecological characteristics occur simultaneously. However, food-web structures can provide process insight in such landscapes by identifying these processes in specific contexts. Here, we used stable isotopes to identify spatially separate resources and infer resource flows underpinning food-web structures in a braided river. We found that river resources used by mobile consumers, including birds and fish, were spatially heterogeneous. Consumer resource use was related to four key structural food-web attributes: (1) spatiotemporal variation in foraging, (2) subsidies, (3) omnivory, and (4) ontogenetic niche shifts. Thus, both physical heterogeneity (contextual physical processes) and adaptive characteristics of consumers (mechanistic processes) were likely contributing to important food-web structures. Identifying these food-web structures in landscapes, across scales of resource use and spatial distribution, provides a way to identify processes and scales likely contributing to food-web stabilization.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70306

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{holly2026,
  title        = {{Food‐web structures link multi‐scale processes in complex landscapes}},
  author       = {Holly A. L. Harris et al.},
  journal      = {Ecology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70306},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Food‐web structures link multi‐scale processes in complex landscapes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.