Towards new labour equity: A bibliometric study of women’s happiness and well-being at work

Isaac Albarracín Pons et al.

Journal of Management & Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10068article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The increasing participation of women in the labour market has highlighted significant advancements but also inequalities that negatively impact women’s happiness and job satisfaction. This study aims to analyse the existing literature on women’s workplace happiness through a bibliometric review, identifying trends, leading authors, research areas, and critical gaps. Employing a systematic bibliometric review methodology, 307 scientific articles published between 2010 and 2024 in the Web of Science Core Collection database were examined. Findings underscore a growing focus on factors external to the work environment, such as gender roles, double shifts, stress, and mental health. Furthermore, the results reveal considerable fragmentation in scientific production and a lack of established academic benchmarks. Conclusions stress the urgent need for organizational approaches that comprehensively address these inequalities, promoting policies of reconciliation, intersectional inclusion, and emotional well-being programmes. The study offers directions for future research and practical applications for fostering more equitable organizational management.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10068

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{isaac2026,
  title        = {{Towards new labour equity: A bibliometric study of women’s happiness and well-being at work}},
  author       = {Isaac Albarracín Pons et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Management & Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10068},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Towards new labour equity: A bibliometric study of women’s happiness and well-being at work

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.