Financial management practices and Agri-SME performance: does subjective financial literacy hold the key?
Kulwa Mwita Mang’ana
What the paper says
This study investigates how four key financial management practices (FMPs), namely the working capital, capital budgeting, financial reporting, and financing affect Agri-SME performance in Tanzania, focusing on the mediating role of the manager’s subjective financial literacy (self-perceived competence). Using a cross-sectional survey of 385 Tanzanian Agri-SME managers, data were analyzed via PLS-SEM with 5,000 bootstraps. Anchored in the Resource Based View and behavioral finance, results show that financing practices (β ≈ 0.17) and subjective literacy (β ≈ 0.13) significantly enhance performance (p < 0.05). Furthermore, working capital management and capital budgeting significantly boosted subjective literacy (p < 0.05). Importantly, financial reporting significantly reduced perceived competence (β≈−0.23, p < 0.05), suggesting potential cognitive misalignment. Indirect paths via literacy were positive but not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The study recommended that support programs must pair access to finance with capability building that bolsters perceived financial competence, and reporting tools must be simplified.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.