Assessing Career Decision‐Making Interventions: Effects of Career Courses and Group Counseling on High School Students

Hang Zeng & Carol Ma Hok Ka

Career Development Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12371article
AJG 2
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Career decision‐making significantly impacts high school students' academic and career trajectories. Although career interventions are recognized as important, gaps persist, particularly in programs targeting Chinese high school students and the inconsistent findings on gender differences. This study evaluated the effects of career courses and group counseling on Chinese high school students. Study 1 assessed the impact of a career course on 308 first‐year high school students. The course increased self‐efficacy but did not reduce career decision‐making difficulties. Notably, gender differences were observed: male students reported increased difficulties, while female students showed a decreasing trend. Study 2 combined a career course with group counseling. The combined intervention significantly reduced career decision‐making difficulties, with no gender differences. These findings suggest that career courses boost self‐efficacy but adding group counseling helps address career decision‐making difficulties. Our study also highlights the need for gender‐responsive strategies.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12371

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hang2025,
  title        = {{Assessing Career Decision‐Making Interventions: Effects of Career Courses and Group Counseling on High School Students}},
  author       = {Hang Zeng & Carol Ma Hok Ka},
  journal      = {Career Development Quarterly},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12371},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Assessing Career Decision‐Making Interventions: Effects of Career Courses and Group Counseling on High School Students

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.