arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

More than a method: Visual ethnography in public administration research

Renate Schelwald

Public Policy and Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251413816article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper explores the use of visual ethnographic methods as a transformative tool, facilitating a dynamic interaction between researchers, policymakers and citizens. Reflecting on the use of visual ethnographic methods as both a way of knowing and a means of communicating, the paper draws from the author’s experience producing a short visual ethnographic documentary about a community garden. Through this case, the paper explores how visual ethnographic methodologies can enable researchers to reshape relations and direct attention through multimodality, invite active engagement through opening new imaginaries, and empower citizens as active participants in policymaking processes. The study shows that visual ethnographic work can be a co-constitutive force for organizations, an interventional practice that reshapes what policymakers notice, how they feel about an issue, and what they consider possible regarding solutions. It can create new epistemological entry points, grounded in embodied, affective, and relational experiences. The paper concludes with reflections on the methodological and institutional challenges of integrating visual work into public administration research and offers practical considerations for doing so.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251413816

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{renate2026,
  title        = {{More than a method: Visual ethnography in public administration research}},
  author       = {Renate Schelwald},
  journal      = {Public Policy and Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767251413816},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

More than a method: Visual ethnography in public administration research

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.