arbiter
JournalsAccount

Towards a lexicon for just sustainability transitions: thinking with capabilities, epistemology, intersectionality, spatiality, and temporality

Katinka Wijsman et al.

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2026.101104article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

• Gives conceptual tools to elucidate meanings of justice in sustainability transitions. • Explains distributive, procedural, and recognition justice dimensions. • Proposes five additional concepts to deepen understandings of justice. • Explains capabilities, epistemology, intersectionality, spatiality, and temporality. • Formulates questions at the junctions of these concepts and dimensions. Scholars increasingly call for attention to the justice dimensions of sustainability transitions, recognizing that the burdens and benefits associated with these transitions differ over social groups, and that the goal of environmental protection can stand in tension with the goal of social justice. However, justice is an ambiguous concept and clarity about what justice in sustainability transitions can mean is limited, which is a problem for meaningful discussion and decision-making. In this paper we provide conceptual tools to elucidate what justice in sustainability transitions can mean, building on three justice dimensions developed in political philosophy (distribution, procedure, recognition) with five additional critical concepts: capabilities, epistemology, intersectionality, spatiality, and temporality. Drawing from theoretical and philosophical thinking in the social sciences and humanities, we discuss what each of these concepts entails, how they are relevant for sustainability transitions, and how they relate to distribution (outcomes), procedure (process), and recognition (interaction). We argue that together, the justice dimensions and concepts, and questions at the junctions between them, bring more comprehension to the analysis and articulation of justice in sustainability transitions. This lexicon contributes to a clearer understanding of justice, including the dilemmas undergirding sometimes contradictory demands. As such it brings questions of value and ethical considerations – in analytical as well as normative forms – front and center in sustainability transitions.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2026.101104

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{katinka2026,
  title        = {{Towards a lexicon for just sustainability transitions: thinking with capabilities, epistemology, intersectionality, spatiality, and temporality}},
  author       = {Katinka Wijsman et al.},
  journal      = {Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2026.101104},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Towards a lexicon for just sustainability transitions: thinking with capabilities, epistemology, intersectionality, spatiality, and temporality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.