Conceptual framework to advancing healthcare system through Agile methodologies, human factors engineering and adaptive leadership
Deepali Vishal Thombare et al.
Abstract
Purpose This paper explores how Agile methods, combined with human factors engineering and adaptive leadership, can improve healthcare delivery by enhancing system flexibility, workforce resilience and patient-centered care. As healthcare environments become more complex and rapidly changing, traditional rigid systems often fail to meet evolving needs. The paper identifies significant barriers to Agile adoption, including rigid organizational structures, limited resources and cultural resistance. It introduces an integrated solution, a Biometric Stress Monitoring Framework to reduce burnout and improve performance. This strategy supports the development of a flexible, responsive and sustainable healthcare system focused on quality outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies a conceptual and theoretical analysis of leadership models, systems engineering and human factors. The framework presents a solution that align with clinical safety standards and organizational needs, offering practical guidance for implementing Agile principles in dynamic healthcare settings. Findings Agile adoption strengthens healthcare system responsiveness, collaboration and adaptability. Key challenges include weak leadership capacity, fragmented infrastructure and resistance to cultural change. The proposed solutions support proactive stress management and leadership growth, improving staff well-being, better decision-making and higher quality in patient care delivery. Originality/value This paper offers a novel perspective by connecting Agile principles with human-centered design and leadership development. The proposed approaches provide practical tools to support employee well-being and real-time responsiveness in healthcare. They contribute to addressing long-standing organizational challenges while advancing a more resilient and effective model of care.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.