On the potential of arbitrage trading on the German intraday power market

Elisabeth Finhold et al.

Journal of Energy Markets2023https://doi.org/10.21314/jem.2023.027article
AJG 1
Weight
0.38

What the paper says

Pair trading on the German intraday power market is a commonly used risk-averse, heuristic trading strategy. However, due to myopic decision-making and a lack of foresight, the profit obtained is far from optimal. By comparing this strategy with the ex post optimal solution (ie, a strategy with perfect foresight), we show on a set of 15 selected days from 2020 to 2022 that the predictive information lets us generate on average more than five times as much profit by excessively buying and selling the same contracts for a trading interval of five minutes. Another problem with pair trading in practice is the possibility of unbalanced auction wins. We show that an unbiased loss of up to 10% has a negligible impact on the obtained profit. In contrast, we also show the value of frequent optimization updates by simulating strategies with only sporadic participation in the market. While this is hardly beneficial for the pair trading strategy, the ex post optimal profit increases on average by 30% when the time between two trades is halved.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21314/jem.2023.027

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{elisabeth2023,
  title        = {{On the potential of arbitrage trading on the German intraday power market}},
  author       = {Elisabeth Finhold et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Energy Markets},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21314/jem.2023.027},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On the potential of arbitrage trading on the German intraday power market

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.38

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.10 × 0.4 = 0.04
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.