arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Book Review: British and Irish Religious Orders in Europe, 1560–1800: Conventuals, Mendicants and Monastics in Motion by Cormac Begadon and James E. Kelly (eds) Cormac Begadon, James E. Kelly (eds), British and Irish Religious Orders in Europe, 1560–1800: Conventuals, Mendicants and Monastics in Motion (Durham: Durham University IMEMS Press, 2022, 276 pp., £95 hardback)

Thomas O’Connor

Irish Economic and Social History2025https://doi.org/10.1177/03324893251388807aarticle
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

No abstract available.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03324893251388807a

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thomas2025,
  title        = {{Book Review: British and Irish Religious Orders in Europe, 1560–1800: Conventuals, Mendicants and Monastics in Motion by Cormac Begadon and James E. Kelly (eds) Cormac Begadon, James E. Kelly (eds), British and Irish Religious Orders in Europe, 1560–1800: Conventuals, Mendicants and Monastics in Motion (Durham: Durham University IMEMS Press, 2022, 276 pp., £95 hardback)}},
  author       = {Thomas O’Connor},
  journal      = {Irish Economic and Social History},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03324893251388807a},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Book Review: British and Irish Religious Orders in Europe, 1560–1800: Conventuals, Mendicants and Monastics in Motion by Cormac Begadon and James E. Kelly (eds) Cormac Begadon, James E. Kelly (eds), British and Irish Religious Orders in Europe, 1560–1800: Conventuals, Mendicants and Monastics in Motion (Durham: Durham University IMEMS Press, 2022, 276 pp., £95 hardback)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.