The Roles of Conspiracy Theories and Political Participation on Justifying Violence in the Capitol Hill Riots

Jesse Koster et al.

Social Psychological and Personality Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261421177article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We investigated the relationship between conspiracy theories, political participation, and justification of political violence during the 2021 Capitol Hill riots in two studies. Study 1 was a correlational survey of participants who voted for Trump in 2020, measuring their conspiracy mentality, belief in the 2020 U.S. presidential election fraud conspiracy theory, political participation, and justification of the violence used during the Capitol Hill riots. Results indicated that justification of violence was highest among politically active participants who also believed conspiracy theories. In Study 2, we manipulated exposure to election fraud conspiracy theories, again in a sample of U.S. participants who had voted for Trump. Although our manipulation produced no main effect, we found a similar interaction with a measure of political participation in predicting justification of violence. We conclude that political participation predicts justification of violence, especially among those who believe in or are exposed to ideologically congruent conspiracy theories.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261421177

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jesse2026,
  title        = {{The Roles of Conspiracy Theories and Political Participation on Justifying Violence in the Capitol Hill Riots}},
  author       = {Jesse Koster et al.},
  journal      = {Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261421177},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Roles of Conspiracy Theories and Political Participation on Justifying Violence in the Capitol Hill Riots

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.