My Work is Who I Am, But it’s Killing Me: An Identity-based Approach to the Paradox of Passion

Karen Landay & Joseph T. Schaefer

Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being2022https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520220000020007book-chapter
AJG 1
Weight
0.59

What the paper says

Sayings like “Do what you love, and you’ll never work a day in your life” epitomize Western society’s emphasis on both the importance and assumed positive nature of passion for work. Although research has linked passion and increased well-being, growing anecdotal evidence suggests the potential for negative individual outcomes of work passion, including decreased well-being and increased stress and burnout. In the present chapter, the authors integrate the Dualistic Model of Passion (which consists of harmonious and obsessive passion), identity theory, and identity threat to describe the paradox of passion, in which individuals overidentify with the target of their passion (i.e., work), resulting in the “too much of a good thing” effect driven by excess passion of either type. The authors thus provide a novel theoretical lens through which to examine the different reactions that individuals may enact in response to threats to passion-related identities, including how these responses might differentially impact well-being, stress, and burnout. The authors conclude by offering future directions for research on the paradox of passion.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520220000020007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{karen2022,
  title        = {{My Work is Who I Am, But it’s Killing Me: An Identity-based Approach to the Paradox of Passion}},
  author       = {Karen Landay & Joseph T. Schaefer},
  journal      = {Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520220000020007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

My Work is Who I Am, But it’s Killing Me: An Identity-based Approach to the Paradox of Passion

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.59

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.61 × 0.4 = 0.24
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.