Surveilled and segregated: A Foucauldian inquiry into colonial welfare and First Nations poverty in Canada

DEBORAH G. YOUNG

Critical Social Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183261432991article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article traces the colonial making of First Nations poverty in Canada through a Foucauldian and settler-colonial lens. Centered on the Cree concept k-ôh-kitimâkisiyahk (“the reasons why we are poor”), it argues that reserves, Indian welfare policy, and the Indian Residential School system operated as intertwined regimes of enclosure, discipline, and biopolitical control over First Nation populations. Drawing on policy history, archival material, and personal narrative, I show how Foucauldian logics of surveillance, moral judgement, and conditional assistance were first applied to poor settlers and then reworked to govern First Nations as racialized wards of the state. A prairie case study of on-reserve welfare in Manitoba illustrates how rationing, agricultural schemes, and postwar “integration” reforms consolidated chronic underfunding, dependency, and jurisdictional conflict that persist in contemporary on-reserve income assistance. The article further examines social work's implication in these welfare regimes. I conclude that First Nations poverty is not a policy failure but a deliberately structured effect of settler colonial governance.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183261432991

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{deborah2026,
  title        = {{Surveilled and segregated: A Foucauldian inquiry into colonial welfare and First Nations poverty in Canada}},
  author       = {DEBORAH G. YOUNG},
  journal      = {Critical Social Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183261432991},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Surveilled and segregated: A Foucauldian inquiry into colonial welfare and First Nations poverty in Canada

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.