The Effects of Bots on Market Reactions to Earnings News

Tahmina Ahmed & Gregory D. Saxton

Journal of Information Systems2026https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2024-049article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Social media platforms such as Twitter influence capital markets by rapidly disseminating information; yet, this environment is increasingly shaped by nonhuman bots. Building on theories of investor attention and information salience, we examine whether bots amplify market reactions to earnings news by directing attention toward larger surprises. Using machine learning to classify 12.02 million tweets discussing S&P 1,500 firms in 2018, we measure firm-specific abnormal bot activity and analyze its association with market responses to earnings announcements. We find that bot activity amplifies the relationship between earnings surprises and abnormal returns. Additional analyses reveal that this effect is stronger when bot sentiment is positive but diminishes with excessive positivity, varies by bot type, and is most pronounced for firms with fewer analysts, further supporting our investor attention argument. Our findings highlight bots’ roles as “attention amplifiers” and underscore the need for greater scrutiny of algorithmic actors in financial markets. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources identified in the text. JEL Classifications: D83; E71; G14; G41; M41.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2024-049

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tahmina2026,
  title        = {{The Effects of Bots on Market Reactions to Earnings News}},
  author       = {Tahmina Ahmed & Gregory D. Saxton},
  journal      = {Journal of Information Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2024-049},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Effects of Bots on Market Reactions to Earnings News

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.