Pressure in the spotlight: effects of monitoring pressure and outcome pressure on time-sharing performance

Niki Pennanen & Lauri Oksama

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications2026https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00697-4article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Performing under pressure, particularly in multitasking environments, is a critical challenge in both everyday life and high-stakes professions. This study investigated the differential effects of monitoring and outcome pressure on time-sharing performance and allocation of visual attention. Using a within-subjects design, 30 participants completed a recently devised time-sharing task requiring prioritization under three different pressure conditions. We hypothesized that in a high-demand time-sharing environment, outcome pressure would impair task performance and visual sampling of subtasks more than monitoring pressure. To investigate, we recorded participants' task performance metrics and eye movements. However, our confirmatory analyses found no evidence supporting either hypothesis. In contrast, our additional exploratory analyses revealed that monitoring pressure, not outcome pressure, led to a statistically significant performance decrease. Notably, this effect occurred without changes in visual sampling. This unexpected finding reflects the high sensorimotor demands of the task, specifically the need for precise and rapid mouse movements, which may have been disrupted by the participants' heightened self-consciousness under monitoring pressure. Our findings contribute to the literature on the differential effects of monitoring and outcome pressure, with potential implications for high-stakes domains like military operations. In situations requiring fine motor control-such as piloting aircraft or operating drones-monitoring pressure may disrupt performance, even without altering attentional allocation. Similarly, everyday activities like driving under observation (e.g., driving tests) or performing in front of an audience may be affected. Understanding how pressure disrupts performance in such scenarios can inform training and support strategies to mitigate its impact.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00697-4

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{niki2026,
  title        = {{Pressure in the spotlight: effects of monitoring pressure and outcome pressure on time-sharing performance}},
  author       = {Niki Pennanen & Lauri Oksama},
  journal      = {Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00697-4},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pressure in the spotlight: effects of monitoring pressure and outcome pressure on time-sharing performance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.