arbiter
JournalsAccount

Polluted Air, Polluted Minds: The Psychological Costs of Air Pollution Events on Employee Work and Life

D. Liu et al.

Journal of Organizational Behavior2026https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70066article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

A growing body of literature has illuminated the impacts of climate change on employees' physiological health. This research advances the field by uncovering evidence of the damaging psychological effects of air pollution on employees, along with an organizational alleviation mechanism. Integrating affective events theory and terror management theory, we theorize that air pollution event disruption leads to increased employees' workplace loneliness and decreased sleep quality at night via the mediating role of employees' anxiety. However, the negative impacts of air pollution can be significantly mitigated for those who experience higher levels of organizational support. We first conducted two quantitative studies (Studies 1 and 2) using the experience sampling method to test the hypotheses. To further enrich the insights derived from these quantitative tests, we also carried out a qualitative study (Study 3) using in‐depth interviews. Taken together, our research generates valuable theoretical and practical implications for understanding the impacts of air pollution events and developing effective organizational coping strategies.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70066

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{d.2026,
  title        = {{Polluted Air, Polluted Minds: The Psychological Costs of Air Pollution Events on Employee Work and Life}},
  author       = {D. Liu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Organizational Behavior},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70066},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Polluted Air, Polluted Minds: The Psychological Costs of Air Pollution Events on Employee Work and Life

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.