Library involvement in academic program review: an exploratory survey of the Canadian perspective

Laura Newton Miller

Library Management2025https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-03-2025-0045article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Purpose This research explores how Canadian university libraries participate in program review, a key component of quality assurance in post-secondary institutions and an important way for libraries to show their value. To become aware of how libraries provide impact, it is necessary to understand what other libraries are doing with processes occurring at a university-wide level. Design/methodology/approach The researcher sent an exploratory survey to university librarians across Canada asking who played a main role in program review tasks, how coordination worked and what was going well and could use improvement in the overall process. Findings Themes emerged on workflow, visibility, schedule, feedback and effects on library work. Although there are different ways of reaching the same goal, academic libraries are involved in helping reach the university’s mission. Originality/value Very little is written about this in the literature (library or otherwise). Most research is not current or only looks at specific components of library involvement (i.e. collection assessment). Not only is this helpful strategically for libraries but getting a sense of how other libraries engage with university and library colleagues will benefit those operationally tasked with supporting academic program review.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-03-2025-0045

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{laura2025,
  title        = {{Library involvement in academic program review: an exploratory survey of the Canadian perspective}},
  author       = {Laura Newton Miller},
  journal      = {Library Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-03-2025-0045},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Library involvement in academic program review: an exploratory survey of the Canadian perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.